From the moment the vessel still left Durban there was an intent, the training course of ~150T has been preserved throughout, and daylight is arriving because the h2o depth approaches eighteen,300+ toes. Was this being a preplanned “treasure hunt�
The try to find the particles and black bins will start from the middle of the month, masking a region of 25,000 sq km from the priority search area while in the southern Indian Ocean beneath a 90-day timeframe, the Transport Ministry declared in a press meeting.
That seems about ideal. The significance of your vertical acceleration is underestimated by many. I feel that either there was nose-down pilot enter, or perhaps the airplane was in a very steep financial institution. A phugoid wouldn't develop such a robust vertical acceleration.
ALSM suggests: January 6, 2018 at 5:50 pm DennisW: Re: BTO bias drift…there is absolutely no identified system by which BTO drift is achievable. The electronic clock jitter has become exceedingly nicely comprehended, Which caps the 7th arc uncertainty. That’s the sole “meaningful noise†from the BTO measurement, and it's very deterministic with zero long term drift/alter.
This really is also close to the realm where by on 29 March an item was spotted (the flaperon?), although not recovered.
This all happening one minute after 2nd motor flame-out doesn't suit the ATSB simulations imo. And it does not healthy the corrections towards the hydraulics on the left wing flaperon and perhaps other corrections (rudder trim?).
Comprehension what occurred soon after gas exhaustion is helpful because it helps us choose the distance through the 7th arc to search. Having said that, if we believe that the validity of the final BFO values as well as related descent fees (and at this stage, I am not mindful of a motive to doubt them), then the 0.
I might like to see your drift analysis, because you are so convinced that I have acquired every thing Erroneous!
I’m fearful, however I've promised, I haven't up to now taken under consideration wind in my design. This was as a result of working day time job obligations. After I have a tiny bit much more time, I'd rework it a little bit, but I also imagine that an additional twist in speed website link would suffice.
Based upon this restricted materials you and Other folks have shaped the ‘viewpoint’ that the injury and seperation pattern of your items was due to significant pace affect and/or aero dynamic forces. And you have some strong arguments I see.
Exactly where do you see a 5200-m (17160 ft) deep gap at 32.5S/97E? Google Earth or other map. The opposite benefit for just a waypoint closer to Arc7 would be that the pilot would have gas estimate to that point. I agree along with you targeting Damaged Ridge is really a attainable aim, but it's difficult to see a selected concentrate on on Google Earth (supplied Dordretch Gap was apparently out of attain).
This pertains to me as a fast (4500ft/min) descent initiated in the their website intervening time the APU kicked in likely to a substantial velocity descent inside the moment right after.
I nevertheless Consider This might be sizeable. The final eight sec. BFO’s could well be right but then the timing is off looking at an uncontrolled superior pace descent regarding the ATSB figure six simulations.
• All the above mentioned is pre- (and post) amble to your query about it rolling the plane before the log-on, leading to Individuals substantial and accelerating descent costs. As in advance of, a relight higher than idle might have no effect, autopilot engaged. If it didn't gentle higher than idle I don't see why it would have any better chance of doing this beneath it, altitude staying considerably a similar.